GlosREC News

22nd January 2009

 


 

 

Alexandra Macrae

Chief Executive Officer

GlosREC

15 Brunswick Rd

Gloucester

GL1 1HG

 

Tel: 01452 301290

Fax: 01452 412876

 

Email: enquiries@glosrec.org.uk

 

 

Gloucestershire Man and Son Accused of Racist Name-Calling

 

 

Charles Windsor ( 60 ) and his son Harry (24 ) who live at Highgrove, near Tetbury have both been criticised in the national press because of two separate incidents when they called Asian friends by nick names which some thought to be racist. Charles, an organic farmer who is a major landowner in the South West is a polo enthusiast but can no longer play because of injuries sustained playing the game . One of his friends in the polo playing circuit is Kolin Dhillon, also a major landowner in Gloucestershire who is also a member of the Cirencester Polo Club and a frequent guest at Charles’s Highgrove estate. He is known as ‘Sooty’ by the members of Cirencester Park Polo Club, including Charles Windsor, because he is of Indian extraction.

 

In a separate incident the ‘ News of the World’ made public home video footage taken by Charles’s son Harry Windsor, currently serving with the Blues and Royals, a fashionable cavalry regiment, in which Lieutenant Windsor is shown with a fellow officer, Ahmed Raza Khan, who is from Pakistan, while they were training to be officers at Sandhurst and whom he refers to as ‘ my little Paki friend’.

 

Well, alright, maybe GlosREC will do anything to give a national story a local slant , but Mr Dhillon and Lieutenant Raza Khan could well have come to their local race equality council for advice about name-calling which either of them might have found offensive. If they had, GlosREC might have advised them that if they felt strongly about the matter, they could report what had happened as a racist incident to the police and, if they had reported it, the police would have been obliged to investigate both incidents. If the police had formed the view that both incidents were sufficiently serious and Mr Dhillon and Lieutenant Raza Khan had been extremely offended or indeed intimidated by the name-calling, Prince Charles and Prince Harry could have ended up in the Magistrates Court.

 

Of course neither man who was the object of the nick name calling says he felt offended.  Mr Dhillon apparently ’ enjoys being called Sooty ‘  by his friends and thinks that Prince Charles is entirely devoid on any racist feelings while Lieut. Raza Khan, who pointed out that the video was filmed three years ago, said Prince Harry was his friend and was not a racist although he did point out that Paki was a nickname which was usually very insulting.

 

What does GlosREC think of these incidents?

 

Prince Charles’s mother is head of the Commonwealth  and he will inherit the title. Both men have had an expensive education  and should be, by virtue of the positions they hold and the advice they should be receiving, aware that nick names like ‘ Sooty’ and ‘ Paki’ which obviously refer to a person’s pigmentation should be avoided. Mr Dhillon was apparently first given the nickname Sooty thirty years ago when he first joined Cirencester Park Polo Club ( not  a milieu where one would even today expect much political correctness) when people thought less about giving racist offence than they do now. Once he had been given the name, as the years went by, I suppose it became increasingly difficult to reject it. For all I know there may be people called ‘ Ginger’ or ‘ Snowball’ in the polo club. If I had been introduced to Mr Dhillon and told his name was Sooty, whatever Mr Dhillon thought about it, I think I would have asked if I might call him ‘ Kolin’ and I think that the Prince should now have the sensitivity to ask his friend if he  to can call him ‘ Kolin’ too.

 

I think that in the case of Price Harry, GlosREC can be more critical. Everyone knows or ought to know that Asian people do not like being called ‘ Paki’ – especially if they don’t come from Pakistan. But , you may say, there’s no offence intended any more than you might intend no offence by referring to someone as Taffy or Jock. The point is, however, not that you are using the expression as affectionate abuse but what the baggage is that the expression ‘ Paki’ carries. You may intend no harm by referring to someone as ‘ my little Paki friend’ or saying that you’re nipping down to the Paki’s for some milk and a some rolls, but firstly the expression is a term of abuse by racists who do not use the expression benignly and secondly because the people you use it against perceive it as an abusive racist term. While many people may use the expression ‘ Paki’ entirely without malice, Prince Harry because of his position as a ‘ Royal’ because of the education he has received and also because the Army is committed to stamping out racism and hate speech should have know not to use the expression.